I - II - III - IV - V - VI - VII - VIII - IX - X

The Marriage Contract

Marriage in Islam is a contract. Thus, as in any contract in Islam, there are elements which are considered essential to its existence, called arkan, the possibility of stipulations of different kinds, legal effects of the contract, etc. Each of these should be understood properly in order to ensure that the marriage has been performed in the proper manner and the rightful effects of the marriage are granted to each of the participating partners.

Definition of Rukn and Shart

Rukn (plural: arkan) can be translated as "pillar" and is an essential part of the legal reality of something. Without it, that legal reality does not exist.

Shart (plural: shurut) can be translated as "prerequisite" or "condition" is a requirement for the legal reality/validity of something but 1) is external to it and/or 2) does not completely void the legal reality if not found.

Az-Zuhaili writes:

"According to the Hanafis, a rukn is something upon which the existence of something else is dependent, however it is also part of that thing which is dependent on it. A shart for them is a prerequisite upon which the existence of something else depends but it does not form a part of that other thing.

For the majority (of the scholars), a rukn is the thing upon which something and its existence rests, it cannot be in reality without it or it is something which is a must. Their famous expression is "It is a thing by which the shari'ah reality of a thing will not exist except with it." That is the case regardless of whether it be an actual part of the thing or something separate from it. A shart for them is something upon which another thing is dependent but which does not form part of it." [Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, Al-Fiqh Al-Islami wa Adillatuhu (Berut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1985) vol. 7 p. 36]

The following example will demonstrate the difference between the Hanafi approach and that of the rest of the schools of thought. The actual existence of the girl that is to be wed is something external to the process of the marriage contract. Therefore, since it is external, the Hanafis would not call it a rukn although, obviously, no marriage would actually take place without her existence. This makes it a shart in their terminology. In the other schools of thought, the fact that no marriage can occur without the existence of the girl getting married is sufficient to call her existence a rukn of the marriage contract even though her existence is external to the actual contract process itself.

The Arkan of a Marriage Contract

All the scholars agree that "offer and acceptance" (Al-Ijaab wa al-qubul) is among the arkan of a marriage. There is a difference of opinion concerning the other arkan as discussed below:

The Arkan of a Marriage According to the Hanafis

Offer and acceptance are the only arkan of the marriage contract in Hanafi fiqh due to their definition of rukn as explained above. Furthermore, in Hanafi fiqh, the offer/acceptance can begin from either party.

The Arkan of a Marriage According to the Jamhur (Majority of Scholars)

Offer and acceptance are among the arkan. For most of these scholars, the offer must be from the woman's side and the acceptance from the man.

The two parties to the contract: the prospective husband and the guardian of the woman.

Some also count the following among the arkan, although the majority of these scholars count them among the shurut:

The presence of witnesses.


The Wording of the Contract

There are a variety of opinions as to exactly which phrases are valid in the transaction of the marriage contract. Of all these opinions, it seems clear that the best of them is that any wording that makes the intent of the contract clear to all involved should be considered a valid marriage, while the best format would be that actually used by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and his companions. Also, it is considered best if the contract is executed in spoken form. However, due to need or necessity, it may be done through writing or signing.

Among the different possible phraseologies, the very clear terms such as "I marry you" as accepted by all. Anything which indicates a temporary nature of the contract is forbidden. In others there is some difference of opinion such as "I present to you", "I give to you", "I sell to you", etc.

The Hanafi and Maliki Approach

This opinion says that any term which is clear by itself or by the context and in this way implies marriage would be considered valid if the witnesses and the parties understand it as such. This is supported by the following segment of a long verse in which Allah mentions all of the categories of women which are halal for the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him):

"...and a woman who gives herself to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to marry her - exclusively for you and not the [rest of the] believers..." [Noble Quran 33:50]

It is also reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) himself used the following expression in performing a marriage:

"I have put her in your possession for the Quran which you possess." [Al-Bukhari]

The Hanbali and Shafi'i Approach

This opinion says that the marriage is not proper unless it uses forms of the following words which are found in the Quran and hadith: nikah or zawaj. Their response to the above evidence is that since the verse clearly applied to something given specifically to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) it is not applicable here and that the actual words of the hadith are from the narrator who may not have transmitted it exactly. Bottom line: Marriage is a contract and, like any other contract if the intention and goal of the contract is clear to all parties, there need not be any additional restrictions on the actual words used. On the other hand, due to the seriousness of this contract, there is no hardship in sticking to the original words used most commonly by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and his companions.

Does it Have to be in Arabic?

According to the majority of the scholars, it is not necessary for the marriage contract to be transacted in Arabic, even for those who have the ability to speak Arabic. Those in the Hanbali school who required the use of forms of the words nikah or zawaj also required that the contract be transacted in Arabic for this reason.

The Different Types of Shurut (Conditions or Prerequisites)

At this point, we need to learn the definition of some general terms in Islamic fiqh which come up in many subject areas, including the one at hand.

Sahih (Sound). A contract which fulfills all of the arkan and the shurut and has full effect in the law.

Batil (Void). A contract that has failed to fulfill specific arkan or vital shurut. A contract which is Batil is the opposite of one which is sahih and has no legal effect at all. If a marriage contract is found to be void, even if it is only discovered after consummation, the legal condition will be as if it never happened at all. The lineage of the father will not be established and there is no waiting period ('iddah) upon the woman. An example of this would be if a man married a woman who was married to someone else at the time.

Fasid (Defective). This is a contract which fails to fulfill some of the shurut, but not the arkan. For non-Hanafis, Fasid and Batil have the same meaning. In Hanafi fiqh, a marriage which was Fasid has some legal ramifications, especially if it was consummated.

With respect to marriage, there are four different kinds of conditions which must be met:

Conditions Required for Initiating the Contract (shurut al-in'iqad). These are the conditions that must be present with respect to the arkan or fundamentals of the marriage contract.

Conditions Required for the Soundness of the Contract (shurut as-sihha). These are conditions which must be fulfilled in order for the marriage to have its proper legal effect. If these conditions are not met, the contract is "defective" (Fasid), according to Hanafi fiqh, "void" (Batil) according to the others.

Conditions Required for the Execution of the Contract (shurut an-nifadh). These are conditions which must be met for the marriage to have actual practical effect. If these conditions are not met, then the marriage is "suspended" (mauquf) according to Hanafi and Maliki fiqh. For example, a minor girl until she reaches puberty.

Conditions Required for Making the Marriage Binding (shurut al-luzum). If these conditions are not met, then the marriage is non-binding meaning that either of the two parties or others may have the right to anull the marriage. If they accept the marriage with such shortcomings, it becomes binding.

First: Shurut Required for Initiating the Contract

In this category, there are conditions concerning the two who are getting married as well as the form in which the contract takes place.

Concerning the Two Getting Married

The two people must meet the qualification of legal competence, i.e., they must be adult and sane. If they are not, the marriage will be invalid.

Secondly, the woman cannot be from those categories of women that are forbidden for a man to marry. For example, suppose a man married a woman and later discovered that they had been breastfed by the same woman. In this case, it is as if the marriage never took place because those two were not qualified or allowed to marry each other and the marriage becomes null and void.

Concerning the Contract

There is near complete agreement on the following conditions relating to the transaction of the marriage contract:

The offer and acceptance must be done in one sitting. In general, this means that the response must be immediate. Exactly what is considered a "sitting" depends on custom and related factors.

The acceptance must correspond to what is being offered. If the guardian says: "I marry you to Khadijah", a response of "I accept Fatimah as my wife" would not constitute a valid contract. An exception to this is if the wali mentions a specific dowry amount and the groom responds with a higher amount. It is regarded that there is no reason for dispute since it is assumed that a higher dowry will be acceptable.

The wali cannot rescind the offer. Unlike transactions of selling, neither party can say "I have changed my mind" once they have uttered the offer/acceptance. It is immediately binding. In a sale, they both continue to have the option to change their mind until the "sitting" is over and they part.

The marriage must be effective immediately. If the wali says "I will marry her to you after one month", there is not marriage and the two remain unmarried.

Note that the custom of saying "I accept" three times common in some Muslim cultures has no legal significance. Once the first "I accept" has been uttered, everything after that is meaningless - whether positive or negative.

Adding Stipulations to the Marriage Contract

This is where one party states a stipulation binding on the other party for specific reasons or goals. The offer/acceptance are tied to this stipulation by mention. There is a difference of opinion among the scholars concerning the validity of conditions of this nature.

Conditions of contracts are two types: 1) those imposed directly by the shari'ah and 2) those drawn up by one or more of the parties. When any contract is entered into, the first type of conditions are covered automatically even if they are not stated in the contract.

Understood Conditions Based on what is Customary

It is a general principle in fiqh that customs can take the status of law. It becomes understood that people are going to behave in a certain fashion. Since that is understood, one party has the right to ask it of the other even if it is not stated in the contract. In the area of marriage, there are some stipulations that are known by custom. These do not have to be mentioned in the contract to be considered binding. However, there are some strict conditions that must be met before a customary act is considered something equivalent to a legal stipulation. These conditions are as follows:

The customary practice cannot contravene or contradict anything expressly laid down by the shari'ah. For example, it is custom in some parts of the world for the woman to pay dowry to the man. In other parts, it is customary to prepare two or three times amount of food that the guests could possibly eat at the walima (wedding feast). Neither party has the right to demand of the other the fulfillment of such customs.

The customary act must be common, well-known and universal and not something practiced only by some portions of the population.

The custom must have been in existence and known before the marriage contract took place.

Other conditions Laid Down by the Two Parties

Any condition which contradicts, compromises or nullifies the main goals and purposes of the marriage contract itself are rejected and, even if stated, are of no legal consequence. For example conditions which state that the woman receives no dowry or that he does not have to support her or that they will not consummate the marriage are all null and void and of no effect whatsoever.

Such conditions must be stipulated and agreed upon at or before the time of the offer/acceptance. Even those scholars who accept such stipulations do not accept them if they are made after the offer/acceptance.

Sound and Acceptable Stipulations

There are two types of sound and acceptable stipulations:

Those embodied in the contract even if they are not stated. This includes conditions known from the shari'ah as well as those known from custom as discussed previously. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said:

"Ahaqqu maa aufaitum min ash-shuruti maa istahlaltum bihi al-furuj."

"The conditions which you have the most duty to fulfill are those by which you have made marital relations lawful." [Bukhari & Muslim]

Many scholars understand this hadith to be referring to these kinds of conditions only, that is, those that are covered by the shari'ah in the first place. This is the view of the Shafi'i school. They do no allow any additional stipulations to be added to the marriage contract.

Those conditions not covered by the essential nature of the contract but which are agreed upon by the contracting parties. These are those stipulations that do not contradict the general goals of the contract, do not bring harm to anyone and which apply to things which are permissible and within the right of the person to agree - that is something that does not go against the shari'ah. They are laid out in the beginning to avoid any conflict or hardship in the future.

In General, Muslims Must Fulfill Their Agreements

Generally speaking, Muslims must comply with any agreements that they make. Allah said about the believers:

"...And those who fulfill their pacts when they make one..." [Noble Quran 2:177]

"O you who believe fulfill your contracts..." [Noble Quran 5:1]

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said:

"Muslims are bound by their stipulations." [Abu Dawud & Al-Hakim - Sahih]

During the time of 'Umar ibn Al-Khattab, a man married a woman upon the condition that he would not move her from his house. The time came when he wanted to move her. They took their dispute to 'Umar and he said: "She has the right to her stipulation." The man said, "In that case, they will certainly end the marriage." He said, "The rights are broken off due to the stipulations." This was the view of many of the Companions, Followers and scholars including Sa'ad ibn Abi Waqqas, Mu'awiyah, 'Amr ibn Al-'Aas, Shuraih, 'Umar ibn 'Abdul 'Aziz, Tawus, Al-Awza'i and Is'haq.

There is another opinion which says that external stipulations - those not covered by the nature of the contract itself - carry no weight and need not be met. This was the opinion of Abu Hanifa, Ash-Shafi'i, Malik, Az-Zuhri, Qatada, Al-Laith, Ath-Thauri, Ibn Al-Mundhir and has been narrated from Ali.

The Proofs of Those Who Say that Such Stipulations are Neither Binding nor Valid

"Every stipulation which is not in the book of Allah is void even if it be one hundred stipulations." [Muslim & Bukhari]

They also cite the following extension to the hadith mentioned earlier about stipulations:

"Muslims are bound by their stipulations except for a stipulation which makes the unlawful lawful or makes the lawful unlawful."

However, this version of the hadith with the added sentence is weak and cannot be used as evidence. As for the hadith mentioned earlier that "The conditions which you have the most duty to fulfill are those by which you have made marital relations lawful.", they claim that this only applies to the conditions which are essential parts of the nature of the contract itself.

Response to Those Arguments

The scholars who permit such stipulations in the marriage contract have responded to the above. As for the hadith "Every stipulations which is not in the book of Allah...", they say that for a woman's wali to make some conditions to her advantage is something permissible and does not go against the Book of Allah.

Actually, such conditions do not violate the Book of Allah and do not make anything forbidden permissible, etc. They simply give the woman the right to annul the marriage if the condition is not satisfied.

Also, there remains no real meaning to the hadith "The conditions which you have the most duty to fulfill..." if one says that it only applies to conditions that are already in force due to the nature of the contract anyway.

The Crux of this Difference of Opinion

This discussion boils down to the understanding of two seemingly contradictory hadith:

"Every stipulation which is not in the book of Allah is void even if it be one hundred stipulations." [Muslim & Bukhari]

"The conditions which you have the most duty to fulfill are those by which you have made marital relations lawful." [Bukhari & Muslim]

It seems clear from the second hadith along with the fatwa of Umar mentioned earlier that there is some room for adding stipulations to a marriage contract. It also seems clear from the first hadith that there are limits on what can be stipulated. Specifically, any stipulations which go against the basic goals and principles of the marriage contract and not allowed and, if stated, are null and void. Thus, the only remaining problem is understanding exactly how this principle applies in practical situations.

For those scholars who don't accept such external stipulations at all, they have no effect, are not binding, and don't affect the validity of the underlying contract. For those who accept them, they give the woman the option to annul the marriage upon her request if the condition is violated. We only mention the woman because the man can divorce at any time with or without a particular cause and so has no need of such an option. Notice that even in the fatwa of 'Umar, he didn't require the man to fulfill the condition, rather he allowed that she could end the marriage if she so demanded.

Conditions for Which there is Agreement that they are Invalid

Even those who accept these stipulations all agree that certain conditions are not allowed. Among them are the following:

Nikah Ash-Shighaar. This is where the two dowries are stolen and "exchanged". For example a man marries his son to another's daughter in "exchange" for the other marrying his daughter to the first one's son. Neither woman receives their dowry.

Nikah Al-Mut'a. Any kind of marriage with a stipulated time limit.

Nikah At-Tahlil. A woman who has been divorced three times and wishes to return to her first husband marries a man on the condition that he divorces her. If this is discovered or if this is her intention, the first husband still does not become lawful for her in spite of this marriage.

Second: Conditions for the Soundness of a Marriage Contract

There are ten conditions (shurut) in this category. Some are agreed upon by virtually all the scholars while others are the subject of some disagreement.

The woman is permissible to the man.

i.e., that she is not one of those forbidden to him by relation, nursing or other existing and conflicting marriage. Some would consider this one of the arkan (pillars) or one of the conditions for initiating the contract. In any case, this condition must definitely be met.

The offer and acceptance is of a permanent nature and not temporary.

All forms of temporary marriage are forbidden in Islam. If anything stated in the offer and acceptance indicates a temporary nature, the marriage is not valid.

Two non-discredited witnesses.

There is some difference of opinion on this issue, but in the final analysis, the hadith is clear.

Ibn Taimiyyah mentioned four existing opinions on this issue:

(1) The marriage must be announced and made public, regardless of whether the contract was actually witnessed or not. This was the opinion of Malik as well as the scholars of hadith, the Dhahiris and one opinion reported from Ahmad.

(2) It is obligatory to have witnesses, regardless of whether the marriage contract is made public or not. This was the view of Abu Hanifah, Ash-Shafi'i and another opinion reported from Ahmad.

(3) Both witnesses and a public announcement are necessary. This is a third narration from Ahmad.

(4) Either one of the two is necessary. This is a fourth narration from Ahmad.

Ibn Taimiyyah himself felt that the second opinion (only witnesses required) is weak. He claimed that there was no authentic source for same and that it was not widely known among the Muslims. Instead, what is required is the public pronouncement letting the people know that the parties got married. He says that if a marriage takes place without witnesses or public announcement it is definitely invalid, if it takes place with witnesses but no announcement it is questionable and if it takes place with both it is definitely valid.

The portion of Ibn Taymiyah's opinion which finds the witnesses NOT a requirement must be rejected, because the hadith on this subject has been found to be sahih:

"No marriage except with a guardian and two non-discredited witnesses."

So the bottom line here is that BOTH the witnesses AND the public announcement are required. In fact, regarding public announcement, the Maliki school says that if the other parties ask the witnesses to keep it silent that the marriage is not valid and the two are to be separated - PERMANENTLY! The Hanbali school holds that such a marriage is not invalid although it is disliked to do so. The witnesses must be two adult and sane Muslim men whose testimony has not been previously discredited.

Both parties to the contract and the bride have willingly accepted the marriage.

The Hanafis say that this is not a condition, but their position is unacceptable and rejected because of ample evidence from the Quran and the Sunnah to the contrary. In the jahiliya, Arabs used to "inherit" (i.e., forcibly marry) their brothers wives if they died. Allah forbid this saying:

"O, you who believe, it is not lawful for you to inherit women against their will..." [Noble Quran 4:19]

There are also two sound and very clear hadith on this matter:

"A previously married woman cannot be married until her order is sought and a virgin cannot be married until her permission is sought. They said: How does she give permission? He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: If she keeps quiet." [Bukhari & Muslim]

"'An ibn 'Abbasin anna jaariyatan bikran atat an-nabiyya (peace and blessings be upon him) fa dhakarat lahu anna abaha zawwajaha wa hiya kariyatun fa khayyaraha an-nabiyyu (peace and blessings be upon him)"

"From Ibn 'Abbas that a virgin girl came to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and mentioned that her father had married her against her will and so the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) gave her the choice." [Abu Dawud & others - Sahih]

Many early scholars allowed this in only one case: a father or grandfather marrying a girl below the age of puberty without her consent. According to them, she has no right to refuse the marriage upon becoming mature. This position is clearly unacceptable and rejected based on the above verse and ahadith.

The bride and groom are specifically identified and known.

Neither of the two contracting parties are in a state of ihram.

The marriage must be with a dowry (mahr).

It does not have to be exactly specified nor does it have to change hands, but it has to be there. More is coming on this subject later.

The parties and witnesses are not bound to keep it quiet.

It is not allowed to make attempts to keep a marriage a secret. The universal custom of the Arabs before Islam was to have marriages very publicly where all around became aware of its existence. Islam confirmed this practice and it is the only acceptable way of marrying. As we have seen, the Maliki school takes this so seriously that they separate the two parties permanently. Some other scholars said that it was a wrong practice, but didn't necessarily invalidate the marriage.

No party is on his/her deathbed.

The "parties" intended here are the bride and the groom. This is because of possible injury to the heirs because of another person becoming entitled to inheritance.

The presence of the guardian or representative (wali) of the woman.

The wali is a Muslim man charged with marrying the one under his charge to a man who will be good for her. There is no disagreement that the first wali is her natural father if he is Muslim and that the last in line is the ruler. Between those two, there is some disagreement about the order but agreement that they come from the girl's fathers relatives - no one from her mother's side enters into the picture. The order, according to many is: father, paternal grandfather, son, grandson, full brother, paternal half-brother, paternal uncle. The wali is an absolute requirement for a marriage, and any marriage done without him is null and void according to the following hadith:

"Laa Nikaha illa bi waliyyin wa as-sultanu waliyyu man laa waliyya lahaa."

"No marriage except with a guardian and the ruler is the guardian of she who has no guardian." [Abu Dawud & others - Sahih]

"If any woman marries without the permission of her guardian, then her marriage is void, then her marriage is void, then her marriage is void." [Abu Dawud & others - Sahih]

It is the job of the wali to marry her to the best possible husband. He must not be guided by his desires nor by her desires. If the person is acceptable in both his religion and his character and appropriate to her in some other way discussed by the scholars, then he must facilitate the marriage and not refuse it for his own desires or biases. If the conditions are not right, then he must refuse the marriage, even if both the woman under his charge and the man desire it. This is a grave trust and he must do his best to fulfill it properly and not bring harm to the woman and/or to society. Allah said:

"O, you who believe, do not commit treachery against Allah and against the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) nor betray your trusts though you know." [Noble Quran 8:27]

What about the case where the wali refuses someone on a non-Islamic basis? As was stated earlier, it is the job of the wali to act in the best interest of the woman according to the standards established by Islam. If a qualified person asks to marry the woman and he turns him down, then he is not doing his job. In such a case, the woman can complain to the judge or ruler and have her wali "fired" (removed). The scholars then differ as to who becomes her new wali, the next male relative in line or the ruler.

The wali must be the same religion as the woman. A non-Muslim father cannot be the wali for his Muslim daughter.

A Rejected Opinion of the Hanafi School

In the Hanafi school of thought there is an opinion that the wali is not a requirement for the validity of the marriage. They even claim to have an argument from Aisha, the one who narrated the hadith:

"No marriage except with a guardian and the ruler is the guardian of she who has no guardian." [Abu Dawud & others - Sahih]

They say that: " Ai'shah married the daughter of her brother, Hafsa bint 'Abdul Rahman while 'Abdul Rahman was gone to Sham. When 'Abdul Rahman returned he was upset but he did not wish to undo what 'Aisha had done so he left his daughter with her groom, Al-Mundhir ibn Az-Zuhair."

Other scholars responded to their argument: It seems from other narrations of the same incident that Aisha simply set up the arrangement but did not actually perform the marriage. Also, it was Aisha herself who said that "Women cannot perform marriages." In this way, she did not contradict what she herself narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).

Being Serious is NOT a Condition for the Soundness of a Marriage Contract

Note that marriage is not a laughing matter and is very serious. Therefore, the mere words make the marriage happen and intention is not required. Also, as we have seen, there is no khiyaar al-majlis (a choice to back out until the sitting is concluded and the parties part ways) in marriage as there is in sales and other contracts. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said:

"Three things which when serious are serious and when vain are serious: marriage, divorce and returning (to one's wife after a divorce)." [Ahmad & others - Sahih]

Third: Conditions for the Execution of a Marriage Contract

The bride and groom must be legally capable for such a marriage, i.e., sane, conscious, past the age of puberty, etc. The contract can take place earlier than this, but the execution must wait until the time that they can actually enter into the marriage relationship.

The wali who performed the marriage was not a more distant wali while a closer one was alive and reachable. For example, if the woman's uncle married her to someone, the marriage would not be valid unless and until the woman's father's consent was verified. In such a case, the contract could be executed.

Fourth: Conditions for the Marriage Contract to be Binding

If these conditions are met, neither party has the right to anull the marriage.

If the marriage of an underage or insane person is done by other than the father or the grandfather, then the father or grandfather has the right to annul it.

That the husband is socially compatible and qualified for the woman.

That the dowry is at least equivalent to those similar to her.

That there is no defect in either spouse. Included in this category would be the case where the woman was said to be a virgin but is then discovered to be otherwise or where either spouse is not physically capable of marital relations.

If, after being married, any of these conditions are not met, both parties (bride and groom) would have the right to annul the marriage. The matter would be taken to a judge or one in authority. However, this is a right or an option. Once the parties accept the marriage with the deficiency it contains, they will after that be bound to such a marriage.

Effects of the Various Conditions on the Marriage Contract

Based on which conditions above are or are not fulfilled, the ruling concerning the validity and legal effect of the marriage contract differs among different schools of fiqh. In the hanafi school, a contract may fall into one of five categories: sound and binding, sound and non-binding, suspended, defective and void. For most of the other scholars, the marriage contract will fall into one of three categories: sound and binding, sound and non-binding or void.

The following table describes the effect of failure to meet certain conditions on the legal effect or conclusion concerning the contract itself:

Effects on the Marriage Contract of Failing to Meet Conditions

Contract fails to meet the arkan (pillars)
The contract is null and void. This is actually a moot point since in reality there WAS no contract if essential components are missing.

Contract fails to meet the conditions for its Initiation
The contract is completely void.

Contract fails to meet the conditions for its Soundness
Hanafi school: the contract is "defective" and hence has some legal effect.
Others: The contract is null and void.

Contract fails to meet the conditions for its Execution
In Hanafi and Maliki fiqh, such a contract is considered "suspended" or on hold until such conditions are met.

Contract fails to meet binding conditions.
The contract is sound but non-binding. The affected party has the right to annul the contract.

Contract meets all necessary conditions
Contract is sound and binding.

Civil Marriages in Countries Which Do Not Apply the shari'ah

In the light of what has been discussed, a very important question arises for Muslims living in lands where the shari'ah is not the law of the land. For Muslims to marry in such situations under the "auspices" of such governments will often involve serious flaws in both the execution and the legal effects of the non-Islamic marriage contract. For example:

No proper wali. Many such secular laws may not require the woman to have a wali at all or the one appointed may not be the rightful one in the shari'ah.

The secular law may not require two witnesses,

Witnesses may be required but not qualified such as non-Muslim witnesses.

The marriage establishes various property rights, inheritance rights etc. both during and after the marriage for which Allah sent no authority. (Avoiding the harm of such issues while living in a non-Islamic society is a much larger issue and involves many things besides marriage.)

The civil marriage may cause additional marriages by the husband to be a crime punishable by a prison sentence.

Because of these and other issues, a secular marriage contract is not sufficient for two Muslims to be considered married Islamically. In fact, they should be avoided if possible. In any case, it is the Islamic marriage with its prerequisites and conditions which makes the two married before Allah. Whether or not a civil marriage should also be undertaken is a case of weighing the harms and benefits involved.

Regarding these "marriages", the following important points should be noted:

If such a marriage was entered into by non-Muslims who later became Muslim, they are considered married and there is not need whatsoever to have another marriage contract.

If they were Muslim but married in a secular manner out of extreme ignorance, it would be best for them to redo the marriage. However, the first marriage could be considered valid and any children resulting from it would be both of their children Islamically.

If two Muslims marry in such a manner knowingly, for example to circumvent the objections of her wali, then the marriage is null and void and they are committing fornication.

Review Questions

1. What would be the ruling for the following case: A man and a woman are married for ten years and then discover that they were breastfed by the same woman.
2. What is the ruling concerning a marriage contract in which the woman did not have a wali? What was the Prophet's statement about such a marriage (2 hadith).
3. Discuss the different opinions concerning whether or not it is allowed to add stipulations to the marriage contract. For those who allow them, what exactly is their effect and which conditions are allowed? Which are not allowed?
4. Give definitions for the following important fiqh terms: rukn, shart, sahih, fasid and batil.
5. Is it necessary to have witnesses for a marriage contract? What are some of the different opinions on this matter and what is the conclusive evidence from the sunnah?
6. What would be the ruling on the following case: A man claims that the marriage contract he just made is not valid because he was only joking when he did it?